Membership
Compare Membership Levels
Why should I join AHEP?
Enhanced Membership Application Guidance
Membership Fees/Join Now
AHEP Ambassadors
Regional Networks
AHEP Values
Institutional Partnerships
Develop
Professional Framework
Higher Education Management and Leadership MSc
Action Learning Set (ALS) Mentoring as part of the MSc
Special Interest Groups (SIGs)
AHEP Mentoring
Digital Resources
Development Monthly
The Reflection Exchange
Mark of Excellence
Connect
Latest from AHEP
Career Stories
Global opportunities
Volunteer roles at AHEP
Job and Voluntary Opportunities
Perspectives: Policy & Practice in Higher Education
Events
Stand Out for Success: Boosting your visibility and impact
Aspiring Governance Professionals
Generative AI Series
Elevating HE Professionals in Scotland
Presenting Yourself with Impact: Networking and Building Your Personal Brand
Leading with Confidence: A Beginner’s Guide to Line Management
AHEP Annual Conference and Exhibition 2025
AHEP Consulting
AHEP Consulting – Organisational change and development for professional services
AHEP Consulting – Student and academic journey
AHEP Consulting – Governance & Compliance
About
Our Strategic Vision and Values
Our people
Governance
Our blog
Equality, diversity and inclusion
Contact us
Login
Register
AUA Autumn Conference Moderation Feedback 2019
Moderators are asked to review each session proposal to ensure consistency and quality of the conference programme. Feedback will be used in the selection process and to provide guidance where the criteria is not met. Please remember that any feedback you provide may be sent directly back to the presenter. Your written comments should reflect this and be in the style of a 'critical friend', should be free from jargon and you should explain your feedback as clearly as possible to enable people to make changes as necessary.
The marking criteria will have been sent to you directly with the session proposals. If you require another copy, please contact: jo@aua.ac.uk
Please select your initials from the drop down list:
*
DL
GL
MH
Proposal Number
*
Session title
*
Your Feedback
Criteria 1 - Understanding the aims of the AUA and the relevance of the topic to professional practice
*
Unsatisfactory
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
Please insert any feedback on criteria 1 here.
Please provide feedback on why you have selected this rating for this proposal. The feedback is important as it allows lead moderators to make an informed overall programme decision. It also allows us to provide structured feedback to the proposal submitters.
Criteria 2 - Alignment of the proposal to the broad theme of the Conference, 'Sustainability?'
*
Unsatisfactory
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
Please insert any feedback on criteria 2 here.
Please provide feedback on why you have selected this rating for this proposal. The feedback is important as it allows lead moderators to make an informed overall programme decision. It also allows us to provide structured feedback to the proposal submitters.
Criteria 3 - Has considered how to deliver the content to maximise engagement, and stimulate critical thought and insight
*
Unsatisfactory
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
Please insert any feedback on criteria 3 here.
Please provide feedback on why you have selected this rating for this proposal. The feedback is important as it allows lead moderators to make an informed overall programme decision. It also allows us to provide structured feedback to the proposal submitters.
Criteria 4 - How well does the proposal address the selected AUA CPD Professional Behaviours?
*
Unsatisfactory
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
Please insert any feedback on criteria 4 here.
Please provide feedback on why you have selected this rating for this proposal. The feedback is important as it allows lead moderators to make an informed overall programme decision. It also allows us to provide structured feedback to the proposal submitters.
Criteria 5 - The structure and intellectual level of the proposal, and clarity of expression (including spelling, grammar, referencing).
*
Unsatisfactory
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
Please insert any feedback on criteria 5 here.
Please provide feedback on why you have selected this rating for this proposal. The feedback is important as it allows lead moderators to make an informed overall programme decision. It also allows us to provide structured feedback to the proposal submitters.
Criteria 6 - Has the proposal considered equality and diversity in the context and delivery of their session?
*
For example: Does the content use a broad range of examples/scenarios/images that illustrate the diversity of higher education?
Unsatisfactory
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
Please insert any feedback on criteria 6 here.
Please provide feedback on why you have selected this rating for this proposal. The feedback is important as it allows lead moderators to make an informed overall programme decision. It also allows us to provide structured feedback to the proposal submitters.
Criteria 7 - Does the content demonstrate that the session will be accessible to all?
*
For example: Has the proposer described how they could or will if required adapt and tailor the format to make it accessible to all?
Unsatisfactory
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
Please insert any feedback on criteria 7 here.
Please provide feedback on why you have selected this rating for this proposal. The feedback is important as it allows lead moderators to make an informed overall programme decision. It also allows us to provide structured feedback to the proposal submitters.
Stay in the know
Receive the latest insight, development opportunities and jobs directly to your inbox.
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
*
Terms
*
I agree to my email being stored and used to receive the marketing and promotional material from AHEP.
Comments
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This iframe contains the logic required to handle Ajax powered Gravity Forms.