AUA Conference proposals standard and EDI moderation | AHEP

Membership
Develop
Connect
Events
AHEP Consulting
About
Commercial Opportunities with AHEP
Annual Conference 2026

Login Register

AHEP Session Proposal Moderation Feedback 2026

Please select your initials from the drop down list:*
Proposal Number*
Session title*
Standard Moderation
Which of the AHEP Professional Framework commitment(s) most closely align with the session?*
- Empowering Professional Development
- Demonstrating Responsible Practice and Personal Integrity
- Working Together
- Being Agile and Adaptable
- Focusing on Results and Taking Accountability
- Delivering Service Excellence
- Engaging in the Wider Context
Who is the target audience?*
- Senior managers and leaders in search of fresh ideas who influence a diverse range of individuals, both within and outside the institution
- Mid-level managers who influence a diverse range of individuals across their institution and work to develop others
- Established professionals who influence colleagues in their area and stakeholders
- Graduates and early-career professionals who are building their knowledge and networks
Criteria 1 - Understanding the aims of AHEP and the relevance of the topic to members’ professional practice*
- Unsatisfactory
- Satisfactory
- Good
- Excellent
Please insert any feedback on criteria 1 here.
Please provide feedback on why you have selected this rating for this proposal. The feedback is important as it allows lead moderators to make an informed overall programme decision. It also allows us to provide structured feedback to the proposal submitters.
Criteria 2 - Alignment of the proposal to the broad purpose of the Conference, ‘Is Higher Education, As We Know It, Sustainable?'*
- Unsatisfactory
- Satisfactory
- Good
- Excellent
Please insert any feedback on criteria 2 here.
Please provide feedback on why you have selected this rating for this proposal. The feedback is important as it allows lead moderators to make an informed overall programme decision. It also allows us to provide structured feedback to the proposal submitters.
Criteria 3 - How well does the proposal address the selected AHEP Professional Commitment(s)?*
- Unsatisfactory
- Satisfactory
- Good
- Excellent
Please insert any feedback on criteria 3 here.
Please provide feedback on why you have selected this rating for this proposal. The feedback is important as it allows lead moderators to make an informed overall programme decision. It also allows us to provide structured feedback to the proposal submitters.
Criteria 4 - Has the proposal considered and demonstrated how to deliver the content to maximise engagement, and stimulate critical thought and insight*
- Unsatisfactory
- Satisfactory
- Good
- Excellent
Please insert any feedback on criteria 4 here.
Please provide feedback on why you have selected this rating for this proposal. The feedback is important as it allows lead moderators to make an informed overall programme decision. It also allows us to provide structured feedback to the proposal submitters.
Criteria 5 - The structure and intellectual rigour of the proposal. Clarity of expression (including spelling, grammar, referencing).*
- Unsatisfactory
- Satisfactory
- Good
- Excellent
Please insert any feedback on criteria 5 here.
Please provide feedback on why you have selected this rating for this proposal. The feedback is important as it allows lead moderators to make an informed overall programme decision. It also allows us to provide structured feedback to the proposal submitters.
Equality and Diversity Moderation
Is the topic related to Equality, Diversity and Inclusion?*
- Yes
- No
Criteria 1: Has the proposal considered equality and diversity in the context and delivery of their session?*
For example: Does the content use a broad range of examples/scenarios/images that illustrate the diversity of higher education?
- Unsatisfactory
- Satisfactory
- Good
- Excellent
Please insert Criteria 1 feedback
Please provide feedback on why you have selected this rating for this proposal. This feedback is important as it allows lead moderators to make an informed overall programme decision. It also allows us to provide structured feedback to all proposal submitters.
Criteria 2: Does the content demonstrate that the session will be accessible to all?*
For example: Has the proposer described how they could or will if required adapt and tailor the format to make it accessible to all?
- Unsatisfactory
- Satisfactory
- Good
- Excellent
Please insert Criteria 2 feedback
Please provide feedback on why you have selected this rating for this proposal. This feedback is important as it allows lead moderators to make an informed overall programme decision. It also allows us to provide structured feedback to all proposal submitters.
Thank you for taking part in the moderation process.

Save and Continue Later

Stay in the know

Receive the latest insight, development opportunities and jobs directly to your inbox.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address*
Terms*
- I and agree to my email being stored and used to receive the marketing and promotional material from AHEP.
Please read through how we handle your data in the AHEP Privacy statement before agreeing: https://ahep.ac.uk/ahep-privacy-statement/
Comments
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Contact Us

Association of Higher Education Professionals (AHEP), George Begg Building, The University of Manchester, Sackville Street, Manchester, M1 3BB
+44 (0)161 528 0531
hello@ahep.ac.uk

Follow us

Quick links

Membership
Connect
Develop

Events
About Us
Blog

Other Links

Membership Terms and Conditions
Event Terms and Conditions
Privacy statement
FAQs

© The Association of University Administrators 2017